Showing posts with label civics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civics. Show all posts
Monday, November 24, 2014
no. 444
"We’ve separated religion and politics, and this was a great innovation. But so deeply embedded in our consciousness is the desire to give our lives some meaning and significance that no sooner did we do this than we infused the new nation-state with a sort of quasi-religious fervor. If you regard the sacred as something for which we are willing to give our lives, in some senses the nation has replaced God, because it’s now not acceptable to die for religion, but it is admirable to die for your country."
Karen Armstrong
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
7:10 AM
0
responses
Labels:
behavior,
civics,
culture,
lowest common denominator,
politics,
religion,
violence
Monday, September 29, 2014
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
no. 423
“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
Frederick Douglas
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
9:48 AM
0
responses
Labels:
civics,
control,
management vs. labor,
politics,
power,
protest
Friday, December 6, 2013
no. 383
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
9:04 PM
0
responses
Labels:
behavior,
civics,
class warfare,
control,
fear,
management vs. labor,
obedience,
power,
respect
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
no. 381
"Wage repression is a fairly self-explanatory term meaning the deliberate undermining of wages by employers. Wage repression is most often used by private sector employers in order to cut their payroll expenditure, but taken as a whole, the state is actually the largest employer, and is just as capable of repressing wages as the private sector.Thomas G. Clark
The idea that economic efficiency can be increased through the repression of wages is an article of faith for ideological neoliberals. Witness the effects of the current Tory austerity programme on wages, or think back to the 1980s when the collective bargaining rights of millions of workers were attacked by Margerat Thatcher’s government.
I say that wage repression is an article of neoliberal faith because (much like a lot of orthodox neoliberal theory) there is actually little actual evidence that wage repression is good for the national economy, and in fact, a lot of evidence that it is actually harmful.
The reason that the subject of wage repression is important now, is that the UK is currently enduring the longest period of wage repression in over a century, in which the average wage has fallen in real terms every single month for three consecutive years (every month since the Tory led government came to power).
…
The idea that wage repression is actually bad for the economy is hardly a new one. Quakers and other non-conformist religious groups realised early in the industrial revolution that by paying reasonable wages, and providing additional benefits such as education and healthcare, they themselves benefited from the massively increased productivity of a loyal, healthy and educated workforce (as compared to the bitterly exploited, poor, unhealthy, malnourished and ill-educated workforces of the less ethically minded of the early industrial pioneers). Probably the most famous rejection of wage repression was the high pay / low price policy of the American automobile manufacturer Henry Ford (hardly a “leftie” by any stretch of the imagination), who paid high wages and made low profit margins on his vehicles, so that his employees would return their wages back to his business through the purchase of the vehicles they themselves had been constructing.
To put the historic objection to wage repression into reasonably simple economic terms: Wage repression is bad because it reduces the disposable income of workeres - When workers have less money to spend, this results in a fall in consumer spending - When consumer spending falls, aggregate demand falls - When aggregate demand falls the economy falls into low-growth, recession or depression.
I don’t think it takes a lot of brains to realise that the less money the public have in their pockets, the less they are going to spend, and that this fall in spending will have a negative knock-on effect on the wider economy.”
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
4:25 PM
0
responses
Labels:
behavior,
business,
civics,
class warfare,
control,
cost,
culture,
economy,
labor,
management vs. labor,
work
Friday, November 15, 2013
no. 362
"This is a generation that sees everything they do wrong as someone else's fault but everything that happens to other people as a matter of personal responsibility. Reading a tale of hard working, well intentioned people getting reamed by a corrupt system even as they work themselves to literal death might be an eye-opener. Sure, it will sail right over the heads of some of them. I feel, though, that the understanding that the world is not fair, life is hard, and getting by is often a tremendous struggle is a necessary precondition to having meaningful political attitudes. The idea that everything that happens to individuals in our society is their own fault poisons our entire culture, from our politics to our communities. People like Sinclair saw through this over a century ago, but somewhere along the way we chose to forget."
Ed, at Gin And Tacos, from the article "The Hand of Fate".
Ed, at Gin And Tacos, from the article "The Hand of Fate".
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
7:38 PM
0
responses
Labels:
achievement,
America,
behavior,
blame,
character,
charity,
civics,
class warfare,
culture,
fairness,
fate,
justice,
management vs. labor,
rat-race,
responsibility
Saturday, October 26, 2013
no. 342
“Oh please. Taxes are not *your* money. If people could give up the idea that it’s THEIR money being pried out of their hands, rather than just another bill, there’d be a lot less whining. You want lights, you pay the electric company. You want a place to live, you pay the bank or landlord. You want food, you pay the grocery store. You want to live in a civilized society, you pay taxes. Get. Over. It.”
Comment of the Day: Paying For a More Civilized Society
Comment of the Day: Paying For a More Civilized Society
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
8:47 PM
0
responses
Labels:
America,
behavior,
civics,
government,
politics,
taxes
Saturday, October 19, 2013
no. 335
"The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.Statement by Bradley Manning read after his sentencing, by his lawyer David Coombs
I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing. It was at this time I realized in our efforts to meet this risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability.
In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.
Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown our any logically based intentions [unclear], it is usually an American soldier that is ordered to carry out some ill-conceived mission.
Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy—the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, the Japanese-American internment camps—to name a few. I am confident that many of our actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.
As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”
I understand that my actions violated the law, and I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intention to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.
If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society. I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal."
via
And, that, my friends, is what a soldier does for his country.
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
7:14 PM
0
responses
Labels:
America,
civics,
cost,
criticism,
culture,
democracy,
government,
guilt,
justice,
military/industrial complex,
politics,
responsibility,
war
Friday, October 4, 2013
no. 320
"A nation that continuously publicizes appeals to 'support our troops' is explicitly asking its citizens not to think. It is the ideal slogan for suppressing the practice of democracy, presented to us in the guise of democratic preservation."
Steven Salaita, No, thanks: Stop saying “support the troops”
Steven Salaita, No, thanks: Stop saying “support the troops”
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
5:31 PM
0
responses
Labels:
America,
behavior,
civics,
democracy,
military/industrial complex,
obedience,
symbols,
war
Saturday, September 28, 2013
no. 314
"[W]hen I told friends and colleagues that I was resigning from my academic job to focus on writing, I was warned that I was making a dangerous mistake, that I could not possibly live on an income that was between twenty and thirty thousand dollars a year. When I pointed to the reality that families of four and more live on such an income, the response would be “that’s different”; the difference being, of course, one of class. The poor are expected to live with less and are socialized to accept less (badly made clothing, products, food, etc.), whereas the well-off are socialized to believe it is both a right and a necessity for us to have more, to have exactly what we want when we want it."
bell hooks, where we stand: Class Matters, chapter 4
via
bell hooks, where we stand: Class Matters, chapter 4
via
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
8:26 AM
0
responses
Labels:
achievement,
aristocracy,
behavior,
civics,
class warfare,
cost,
culture,
life,
management vs. labor,
money,
poverty
Friday, August 23, 2013
Thursday, August 1, 2013
no. 255
"Why Are Beauty Contestants Getting Harder Questions Than Politicians?"
Pryme
Good question. The basis for his question here and here.
Pryme
Good question. The basis for his question here and here.
Posted by
daveawayfromhome
at
7:33 PM
0
responses
Labels:
censorship,
character,
civics,
conspiracy,
culture,
debate,
democracy,
government,
media
Monday, July 29, 2013
no. 252
"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."
James A. Baldwin
James A. Baldwin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


